My friend JB has an Olympus SZH-10 that he paid $4500 for in 2010
(he got a 58 percent discount on a long list of items
including two objectives, a camera adapter, and an illuminator).
It sounds like a lot of money, but you understand when you look through
one of these and see how effortlessly it goes to powers over 100x
(My Nikon Stereozoom struggles to get to 40x).
SUBTOTAL: ...................................................$10,805.00 Less 58% discount ................. ($6,266.90) Total:............... $4,538.10He and I have both concluded that we prefer other methods than shooting through the microscope for taking mineral photographs, so all of the phototube and video adapter and photoeyepiece could be deleted. Also for me, the transmitted light illuminator is something I could do without.
In addition I might go with just one objective (a 1.6x like Joe has). With two objectives on a turret, whenever you change objectives you have to adjust lighting. With the 1x objective you get 7x to 70x, with the 2x objective, you get 14x to 140x. With a 1.6x objective you would get 11.2 to 112x, which actually sounds great. Also note that the extra objective costs at least an additionl $500, along with $200 or so for the revlving nosepiece.
Joe made a horsetrade for his microscope, so his experience is of no value for estimating possible costs. ES paid $12,000 for his SZX-16 unit.
Tom's Mineralogy Info / [email protected]